Cooperation between antitrust agencies at the international level

by Bruno Zanettin

Publisher: Hart Pub. in Oxford, Portland, Or

Written in English
Cover of: Cooperation between antitrust agencies at the international level | Bruno Zanettin
Published: Pages: 307 Downloads: 533
Share This

Places:

  • United States.,
  • European Union countries.

Subjects:

  • Antitrust law -- United States.,
  • Restraint of trade -- United States.,
  • Antitrust law -- European Union countries.,
  • Restraint of trade -- European Union countries.,
  • Exterritoriality.,
  • Law enforcement -- International cooperation.

Edition Notes

Includes bibliographical references (p. [283]-295) and index.

StatementBruno Zanettin.
Classifications
LC ClassificationsK3850.5 .Z36 2002
The Physical Object
Paginationxxiii, 307 p. ;
Number of Pages307
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL3702989M
ISBN 101841133515
LC Control Number2003270015

This seminar examines recent developments in the economic approach to antitrust law and practice. Topics include issues at the frontier in various areas, including some or all of the following: decision-theoretic approach to antitrust, partial ownership acquisitions, advanced merger analysis and policy, buyer power, conditional pricing practices, intellectual property/antitrust interface, pay. See below for a selection of the latest books from Competition law / Antitrust law category. Presented with a red border are the Competition law / Antitrust law books that have been lovingly read and reviewed by the experts at Lovereading. With expert reading recommendations made by people with a passion for books and some unique features Lovereading will help you find great Competition law. The MOU is designed to promote communication and cooperation between U.S. and Chinese antitrust enforcement agencies and provides for periodic high-level consultations. Full Content: Imperial Valley News. Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newslette r for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world. "Strengthening Trans-Atlantic Antitrust Cooperation," A project jointly sponsored by The Brookings Institution and the Royal Institute of International Affairs - Case Studies - Compiled by Simon J. Evenett, The Brookings Institution, Rutgers University and CEPR Law and Economics Consulting Group (LECG): "Standards Wars - News From the Front.

Antitrust Policy and U.S. Competitiveness. In the s Congress passed several laws that relaxed the antitrust prohibition against cooperation among U.S. firms, including the National Cooperative Research Act of (NCRA) and the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act (OTCA). which antitrust law is applied are increasingly transnational. But we enforce the laws within a framework that in many ways was designed for a period when that was not the case. The same is true of antitrust agencies in most parts of the world.1 *Professor of Law, University of . In the United States, antitrust law is a collection of federal and state government laws that regulates the conduct and organization of business corporations, generally to promote competition for the benefit of main statutes are the Sherman Act of , the Clayton Act of and the Federal Trade Commission Act of These Acts serve three major functions. Besides my contribution to antitrust thinking via influential Law Review articles, I was also instrumental in fostering the increasing transatlantic and then global cooperation between dozens of national antitrust enforcement agencies. l returned to the private bar in November as a partner in one of only four ‘Brussels Elite’ practices.

  I. AGGREGATE PATTERNS IN FTC AND DOJ ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY The major antitrust statutes--the Sherman Act, Federal Trade Commission Act, Clayton Act, and the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act--have the basic objective of regulating business and controlling firms which engage in anticompetitive practices, in order to promote social welfare.(4) Federal antitrust agencies have .   () See id. at (outlining cooperation between the countries' antitrust enforcers). () That is, the European Union is a regional association of countries that have negotiated a system of competition laws that are applicable throughout the European Union and have been applied extraterritorially. See Guzman, supra n at on antitrust enforcement, this has been an area to watch as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) (collectively, the agencies) transitioned under a new Republican administration. In , President Trump announced his nominees to lead the Antitrust Division 6 of the DOJ and the FTC.

Cooperation between antitrust agencies at the international level by Bruno Zanettin Download PDF EPUB FB2

The book therefore argues that the efficient use of bilateral cooperation will be limited to a small number of Cooperation between antitrust agencies at the international level book competition agencies.

If international anticompetitive practices are to be efficiently addressed by an increasingly large and heterogeneous group of competition agencies, horizontal cooperation between antitrust Cited by:   This book addresses the issue of international antitrust enforcement, focusing on bilateral cooperation between antitrust agencies, in particular the European Commission and the US agencies.

It shows how bilateral cooperation was developed as a Author: Bruno Zanettin. About Cooperation Between Antitrust Agencies at the International Level. The issue of international antitrust enforcement is high on the agenda for both developed and developing countries. Bilateral cooperation between antitrust agencies, in particular the European Commission and US agencies, is the focus of this new work.

Get this from a library. Cooperation between antitrust agencies at the international level. [Bruno Zanettin] -- "The issue of international antitrust enforcement is high on the agenda for both developed and developing countries.

Bilateral cooperation between antitrust agencies, in particular the European. Get this from a library. Cooperation between antitrust agencies at the international level. [Bruno Zanettin] -- Addresses the issue of international antitrust enforcement, focusing on bilateral co-operation between antitrust agencies, in particular the EC and US agencies.

It. Cooperation Between Antitrust Agencies at the International Level By: Bruno Zanettin. See larger image. Published: This book is also available in other formats: About Cooperation Between Antitrust Agencies at the International Level. cooperation between antitrust agencies at the international level Download cooperation between antitrust agencies at the international level or read online here in PDF or EPUB.

Please click button to get cooperation between antitrust agencies at the international level book now. All books are in clear copy here, and all files are secure so don. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Cooperation Between Antitrust Agencies at the International Level by Bruno Zanettin (, Hardcover) at the best online prices at eBay.

Free shipping for many products. Cooperation Between Antitrust Agencies at the International Level. Authors: Bruno Zanettin. Categories: Business & Economics. Type: BOOK - Published: - Publisher: Hart Publishing. Get Books. This book focuses bilateral cooperation between antitrust agencies, in particular the EC and the US agencies.

Language: en Pages: Review of Cooperation Between Antitrust Agencies at the International Level, by Bruno Zanettin. By Herbert J. Hovenkamp Topics: Antitrust and Trade Regulation, Comparative and Foreign Law.

The remainder of the book is a series of nine case studies of several of the most prominent examples of cooperation and the lack of cooperation on transatlantic antitrust enforcement. Because US-EU antitrust relations have only been formalized for ten years, the best way to really understand the relationship is to study the real-life examples.

It is the first official high-level talk between public enforcement agencies of China and US, since DOJ and FTC signed an antitrust memorandum of understanding (MOU) with China’s three antimonopoly agencies in Julytherefore, afforded with profound significance in terms of enhancing bilateral communication and cooperation among them.

It is probably because of the significant level of cooperation between the two enforcement systems that US agencies have moved towards a harsher enforcement regime, especially under the Obama administration. The Intel litigation is a very good example of how US public enforcement is moving closer to the European system.

In Maythe. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an updated guide to international antitrust enforcement, last issued in The guidelines discuss the agencies' international enforcement policy, investigative tools, and cooperation with global antitrust authorities.

Published Article/Book Citation. Herbert J. Hovenkamp, "Review of Cooperation Between Antitrust Agencies at the International Level, by Bruno Zanettin. ". The book therefore argues that the efficient use of bilateral cooperation will be limited to a small number of well-established competition agencies.

If international anticompetitive practices are to be efficiently addressed by an increasingly large and heterogeneous group of competition agencies, horizontal cooperation between antitrust. Topics include the harmonization and coordination of competition laws, cooperation between enforcement agencies, international judicial assistance, and the role of.

The U.S. Antitrust Agencies and the Chinese and Indian Competition Agencies as well as various aspects of civil and criminal antitrust enforcement. This high-level dialogue was an important step in cementing working relationships between the U.S.

and Chinese agencies. augur well for enhancing the quality of international cooperation. discrepancy between agencies on antitrust enforcement principles, we believe that a forced path to uniformity would result in enforcement at the level of the lowest common denominator.

1 A second theory of international antitrust cooperation is a more limited multilateral. Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Review of Cooperation Between Antitrust Agencies at the International Level, by Bruno Zanettin. 28 European Law Review (), 2 pages.

Westlaw Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Review of Brandeis and the Progressive Constitution: Erie, the Judicial Power, and the Politics of the Federal Courts in Twentieth-Century America, by. Modern competition law was first employed by countries over one hundred years ago in order to address issues relating to restrictions of trade at the national level.

Recent international economic integration has weakened the distinction between the domestic and the international in several fields of economic activity, and consequently the laws.

Taking examples from regions such as Africa, the Middle East and Asia, Maher M. Dabbah looks at the law and policy in developing countries and at a regional level, the internationalisation of competition law and the doctrines of extraterritoriality, bilateral cooperation and multilateral cooperation as well as the relationship between.

Close cooperation between air carriers in international airline alliances can raise significant competition law issues. To limit the antitrust risks, airlines often seek to take advantage of grants of antitrust immunity that may be available in the jurisdictions where the alliance may operate.

global issues in antitrust and competition law By Dr competition from distortion and restraint and on the national level they reflect the relationships between markets their participants and those affected by we are living through the most dynamic title covers international and comparative issues of antitrust law economics and policy it.

Cooperation with other competition authorities takes place at two levels. At bilateral level, the Commission has engaged in a wide range of cooperation activities with competition authorities in a number of third countries on the basis of bilateral agreements or memoranda of understanding.

The nature of the cooperation activity varies between. While the current forms of international cooperation are not well suited to tackle this problem, this paper argues that the scope for conflict over international antitrust measures can be reduced.

The changes identified in the international antitrust scenario because of the crisis reveal an acceleration of a trend towards the “nationalization” of competition policies that certainly will impact convergence, at least on a substantial level.

The International Antitrust Landscape: From the. FTC Acting Chairman Maureen K. Ohlhausen Speaks on Joint FTC-DOJ Antitrust Guidelines for International Enforcement and Cooperation Before International Bar Association Conference FTC Closes Investigation of Honeywell International, Inc.

and E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. Rulings from the EU and the US – and Germany – illuminate key aspects of antitrust law. July saw two key developments in the EU and US antitrust processes in the so-called ebooks case, under which arrangements between several book publishers and Apple, as distributor of electronic books – "ebooks" – on its iPad tablet computers and other Apple electronic devices (in competition.

Antitrust matters are rarely isolated within a single state or federal agency or jurisdiction. We represent clients facing multi-dimensional antitrust challenges on the transactional, regulatory and litigation fronts, mobilizing an unmatched combination of courtroom excellence, government experience and legal, economic and academic prowess on our clients’ behalf.

We are concerned with the effectiveness of leniency programs and the benefits of international antitrust cooperation between agencies. When international antitrust prosecution is uncoordinated, multi-market contact allows firms to reduce the amount of self-reporting in equilibrium and sustain cartels more effectively.Downloadable!

Since the s, an intensive discussion on the necessity and the potential design of international competition policy has developed. As a preliminary result, some general tendencies can be observed: Many states (including the U.S.

and the EU) and most antitrust experts hold the opinion that the traditional system of national competition laws (including their extra-territorial.The International Antitrust Enforcement Assistance Act (IAEAA),2 enacted by the U.S.

Congress inis designed to enable antitrust enforcement authorities to obtain evidence located outside the United States under the authority of reciprocal mutual assistance agreements negotiated by U.S. antitrust agencies and their foreign counterparts